There are conflicting views regarding whether the original history of a
can determine an individual's
greatly.
essay will analyse the argument from both sides before deducting my personal opinion.
On the one hand,
who believe a national
can influence a person's
considerably would provide the following reason. Generally speaking, the
of a
more or less represents a
's religious concepts which are part of the reasons why groups of
get together and establish an independent
. While it is not unusual that
beliefs in religion regulate its national inhabitants, about their lifestyles the rules needed to be followed.
, many Muslim
like Iran believe their
are created by god and
living in these
should follow certain instructions and dictations,
as headscarves on women's heads, to show their respect and faithfulness to their god.
, the way that a
was formed will influence
's policies or even laws,
deciding the certain range of cultural lifestyles of national inhabitants.
, opponents to
way of thinking have their own opinion, which they can
easily justify. Since we are now living in a world of globalisation, we cannot deny that most parts of the world are muti-cultural nowadays.
would lead to the fact that
in these places are often exposed to different cultures via forms like music, movies or dressing and in turn are easily influenced by those. Nowadays, most Chinese,
, are wearing T-shirts and listening to pop music which are cultural products from western
, while only a few still stick to wearing Chinese-style dresses or suits as well as traditional Chinese music.
, the
of their own
seems unappealing and irrelevant to them in terms of cultural influences.
In conclusion, I believe that the impact of a
's
on one's
depends on the level of globalisation in
. If a
is not affected by cultural invasion and still sticks to its own
,
the influences on individuals would be great. Whereas if a
is a highly cultural mosaic,
's choice in cultural belief is unlikely to be affected by the history of its
.