Some people think that the government should strictly control the supply of fresh water, as it is a limited resource, while others it should not be regulated. Discuss both views.

Fresh

water

is one of the most valuable resources on the planet. Some believe the government should regulate its supply and usage, while others claim it should be unrestricted.

This

essay will

first

explore the reason behind governments overseeing the

water

supply, and

second

, it will discuss why some people are against strict regulation policies of

this

natural

resource

. On the one hand, governments are responsible for providing

water

to most of the population and controlling the supply by building dams, canals and large storage tanks. Authorities are accountable for administering

this

natural

resource

essential to the country's economy. Nations are aware that it is a limited

resource

and,

therefore

, must be regulated to ensure positive outcomes for the population. China and Europe have been battling

water

scarcity for the

last

decade, and recently, they have declared that several rivers are drying out.

On the other hand

, some people may feel that the government should not regulate freshwater reserves. Citizens have the right to fresh

water

, which is essential to life. In some countries like Egypt,

water

restrictive policies have proven unsuccessful;

therefore

, activists are imploring the authorities to devise alternative solutions to

water

regulation.

For instance

, a new urban development in Sydney has built two

water

networks to supply households. The

first

delivers fresh

water

for drinking purposes, while the

second

provides recycled

water

for irrigation, bathrooms and other purposes. Wastewater is

then

purified and returned to households as freshwater. In conclusion, some feel that authorities should devise alternative solutions to restricted

water

supply, while others consider

this

natural

resource

too precious and

thus

, governments should oversee it.