Advertisments of snacks and toys have a great impact on children and their parents. So, the advertisement to children should be banned. Do you agree or disagree.

In

this

present world, the promotion of

snacks

and

toys

has a huge influence on families.

Therefore

,

this

action should not be allowed by the authority. I completely agree with

this

idea: because children might get unhealthy and fat by consuming junk food, and some kinds of

toys

could affect scion and their attitudes.

Firstly

, recent studies show that consuming unhealthy

snacks

might cause obesity in children.

For example

, one of the prospective studies that worked on an age group between 3 and 5 years old illustrates a high correlation between the amount of chocolate consumed and obesity rates.

Although

chocolate is categorized as healthy food,

this

result is very alarming. So,

this

will prove to us how

snacks

can be perilous even if they seem harmless.

Secondly

, the marketing strategies of big companies have enlarged their portfolio of barbaric

toys

day by day.

As a result

of that, the more

daughter

Fix the agreement mistake

daughters

show examples

or sons have these

toys

, the more fights and injury rates are increasing on the playgrounds.

For instance

, there was only a single type of soldier and sword on toyshops’ shelves ten years ago, now there are plenty of them and

additionally

bombs, warriors, tanks, and guns. Sadly, kids start fighting as soon as they get them in the shops.

Consequently

, these kinds of issues may corrupt the offspring’s character and improvement. To summarize, the possibility of fatness and illness may rise by consuming grub, and dangerous types of

toys

also

may have a bad influence on kids. Because of

this

,

it is clear that

government

Correct article usage

the government

show examples

or authorities have to restrict advertisements about

toys

and grub. It is predicted that

snacks

can be risky and children’s growth may be affected by

toys

simply.