Some people insist that as the quality of people's lives is not necessarily enhanced by the
(
as music and painting), the
needs to find another area for investment. In my view, I firmly disagree because art has actually contributed to public
in various ways
mankind can enjoy an opulent lifestyle for history. Another reason is that
funding for the preservation of the
should be made available whether the
advance human civilization or not because the
themselves have significant worth as a cultural and social heritage.
, mankind has been able to improve the quality of life for centuries thanks to the varied contributions that art has made to
. Nowadays, the
play an important role as a community builder and prosperity generator for the public interest. To be specific, the
create jobs and produce tax revenue. There can be seen in a lot of cities that a strong
is an economic asset that stimulates business activity, attracts tourism, and expands a
workforce and tax base. For
reason, the
have been shown to be a successful and sustainable strategy for revitalizing rural areas, cities, and populations struggling with poverty. In
regard, the
should provide financial support for the
in terms of its significant social benefits. The creative industry in Arkansas, the United States,
, employs nearly 27,000 individuals and generates USD 927 million in personal income for Arkansas citizens in 2016. Creative enterprises are the
largest employer after transport and logistics and perishable and processed foods. In the state of North Carolina, the wages and income of workers employed by creative industries infused USD 3.9 billion into the
economy in 2016. And in Massachusetts state, the 17.6
percentChange the spelling
show examples
yearly growth of the cultural
contributed USD 4.23 billion to the
economy.
, whether the
contribute to the development of human
or not, since the
themselves have meaningful value as a cultural, and social legacy,
assistance should be provided financially for the preservation of the
. Fundamentally/In fact,
aid does not necessarily target the improvement of well-being in human life. As some have insisted, it could be partially true that the
may not help for shimmering the quality of human life.
, the
should preserve the
in an effort for conserving its true value as a cultural and social legacy, not by its social functional/contributing values.
, the
can secure culture and heritage, passing along a
unique character and traditions to future generations of citizens. As supporting
, nowadays, the
and cultural areas have been shown the modern trend of including cultural heritage, cultural rights, cultural diversity, freedom of artistic expression, mobility of artists, and access to culture.
In conclusion, I firmly believe that
authorities should provide financial aid to the
in the point that creative industries offer numerous benefits to national economies, and countries have an opportunity to both improve livability and boost national economies by investing in the
and culture.
, regardless of the capability for contributing to human
, the
area has a unique value as a cultural and historical legacy in mankind, which is another reasonable basis for
assistance.