IELTS Writing Samples by topic

5.5

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Few people argue that arts like painting and music do not really impactful for people's life to increase their quality as a human. That is why the government should allocate money to other useful areas. In my point of vi

6.5

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people believe that arts like painting and music do not directly improve the quality of life and government should spend money on other parts of society. I totally disagree. I believe that arts play an important rol

band

Some people say arts such as music and painting cannot directly improve the quality of people's life, so the government should not put money on art such as music and painting, instead, they should spend more money on con

Some individuals believe that the state should pay for public life works rather than raising funds for the educational arts subjects because these are not contributors to their future growth. I strongly disagree with t

band

Some people say arts such as music and painting cannot directly improve the quality of people's life, so the government should not put money on art such as music and painting, instead, they should spend more money on con

Some individuals believe that state should pay for the public life works rather than raising the funds to the educational arts subjects because these are not contributor in their future growth. I strongly disagree the st

4.5

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

some people think that some fields like art which inculde painting and music does not directly inhance the quality of life and government should spend their money in other things.Well, there are people who agree with thi

7.5

band

Some people think that the arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve quality of people's life, so government should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the arts, encompassing drawing and music have played a crucial role in human development. The number of proponents tentatively contemplates that they are unfortunately unable to meet the quality of human life.

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve the quality of people’s life, so the government should spend money on other areas. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

A few people think that the quality of people's life cannot be better directly with arts, therefore the government should spend financial resources on other fields like medicine, science and technology. I agree completly

8.5

band

Some people say arts such as music and painting cannot directly improve the quality of people's life, so the government should not put money on art such as music and painting, instead, they should spend more money on con

People have different opinions about whether the authority should allocate money to art sections, such as music and painting. Some of them insist that governments should put more money into public services as the arts ha

7.5

band

Some people think that the arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve quality of people's life, so government should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Some people insist that as the quality of people's lives is not necessarily enhanced by the arts (such as music and painting), the government needs to find another area for investment. In my view, I firmly disagree becau

5.5

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Whilst the continuous development in the arts and literature over the aeons, some individuals condemn the huge sum being spent in this field. As, arguably, it does not seem to have any profound impact on improving the qu

band

Some people believe arts such as painting and music cannot directly improve quality of peoples life, so that governments money should be spent on other things. How far do you agree or disagree?

Some section of public feel that quality of life is not enhanced when the government invests funds on arts like painting and music instead it should be spent on other entities. I agree to this statement to a greater exte

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

İt is consider by some people that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. I completely disagree with the

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) does not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

In our modern society, the development of economy and civilization cannot lack the contribution of arts because it brings a multitude of advantages to serve everyone. Some people believe that the government should invest

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) does not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

In our modern society, the development of the economy and culture cannot lack contribution to the arts because it brings a multitude of advantages to serve everyone. Some people believe that the government should earn mo

band

Some people think that arts (such as painting and music) do not directly improve the quality of people's life, so governments should spend money on other areas. Do you agree or disagree?

Throughout history, arts had played an essential part in our spiritual life before transforming into a lucrative industry. In contrast, several opinions argue that because living quality can not be directly affected by a

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In the contemporary era,there is a heated argument over the issue that a living standard does not depend upon the arts and organisations have to invest their funds into another field which leads to improving the status o

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that the improvement of people’s living standard is not directly related to arts, such as paintings and music, thus it is more reasonable if government fundings are used in other urgent areas. While fie

5.5

band

People believe that arts like painting and music does not directly improve the quality of life, and therefore they think government’s money should be spent on other things. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that the improvement of people’s living standard is not directly related to arts, such as paintings and music, thus it is more reasonable if government’s fundings are used in other urgent areas. While f

🚀 Prepare for IELTS writing section today!

Unlimited Task 1 & Task 2 checks
Practice with essays, charts, and letters.
Personalized suggestions & mistake analysis
Spot every mistake and boost your score.
Topic ideas & vocabulary helpers
Expand your ideas and use the right words.
Progress tracking
Watch your writing improve with every practice.