A highly controversial topic today relates to whether the responsibility for criminal avoidance belongs to the authority or the citizen. In
this
essay, I will examine Linking Words
this
question from both points of view and Linking Words
then
explain why I believe the accountability of leaders is larger.
There are social activists who are of the opinion that the government have to be in charge of controlling crime. The main reason for believing Linking Words
this
is that criminal law is constructed by the parliament which is Linking Words
also
certainly responsible for its execution. It is possible to say that the police force is founded by the government in order to primarily Linking Words
ensures
social security. A great illustration of Correct subject-verb agreement
ensure
this
is the police may reinforce their manpower to increase hourly check-ups on every main street of a city to Linking Words
early
detect criminal signals Rephrase
apply
such
as thief.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, some politicians are convinced that the self-protecting obligation of the individual is more important. They often have Linking Words
this
opinion because offence activities impact directly the safety of citizen and their relatives. Linking Words
Therefore
each individual should play the first role of securing themselves when they encounter dangerous incidents. Linking Words
For instance
, when someone copes with a robber, they should have the self-prepared knowledge to deal with Linking Words
this
appalling situation to avoid injury.
In conclusion, I reckon that both arguments have their merits. On balance, Linking Words
however
, I feel that the government should play a crucial role in resolving Linking Words
this
social matter. Linking Words
This
is because they have professionals force who are well-equipped with skills and tools to face the offenders.Linking Words
Minh_nhatthan