There seems to be an increasing trend towards assessing students through exams rather than continual assessments. What are the advantages and disadvantages of exams as a form of assessment?

In

this

contemporary epoch, there has been a substantial rise in assessing

students

through

exams

instead

of continual assessment. It is beneficial as

exams

provide written clarification to a

student

and put a

student

into more theory practice for their disciples.

However

, they have limitations, as they do not give practical knowledge to pupils by limiting them to a theoretical

approach

to a particular subject.

To begin

with, the benefit of performing assessments with

exams

is that it is a prudent

approach

to give

students

their performance evaluation as it implements stringent rules and yardsticks.

For instance

, if a

student

is performing well in an exam, the score result in that exam will boost their confidence to perform more effectively.

Moreover

, the writing exam helps

students

comprehend what they need to work on by finding trivial mistakes, which allows the pupil to achieve something far better.

However

,

in contrast

to the above,

this

approach

of using

exams

as an assessment these days could be a colossal mistake as

this

prevents

students

from achieving an implicit faith in the practical application of knowledge. As depicted by the University of Toronto in a 2019 survey,

students

who are more confident in the pragmatic

approach

of their respective study domains are becoming enormously successful compared to any other theory-prone

student

.

To conclude

, the above statement has pros and cons, as sometimes there is a more proactive need for practical assessment as it gives more concern in theory learning. In some cases, there is a craving to succeed more in practical areas as it brings a paradigm shift in the

student

’s confidence.