Nowadays technology is increasingly being uswd to monitor what people are saying or doing. So you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?

A highly controversial topic today relates to whether should use high-tech tools to manage human behaviours or not. In

this

essay, I will examine

this

question from both points of view and

then

explain why I believe the disadvantages of

this

are higher. There are scientists who are of the opinion that applied science should be allowed to supervise every activity in society. The main reason for believing

this

is that crime nowadays become more and more complicated

therefore

technology

such

as street cameras with a face-detected function will permit the

authority

Fix the agreement mistake

authorities

show examples

early

observes

Wrong verb form

observe

show examples

criminal signals

.

Rephrase

early.

show examples

It is possible to say that the community can be enhanced more safety. A good illustration of

this

is communist China successfully applied facial monitoring technology to curb the crime rate under 30% compared to the past ten years.

In contrast

, Some social activists are convinced that the supervision of the government towards their citizens is illegal.

This

action people often

argued

Wrong verb form

argue

show examples

because It detrimentally offends the human right of personal information security.

Secondly

, automatic systems may still

occur

Verb problem

cause

show examples

errors leading to the wrong alarm which makes everything turn to chaos.

For instance

, a catastrophe will happen if the supervising system of a city is hacked by a terrorist organization. In conclusion, I reckon both arguments have their merits. On balance,

however

, I believe those in power should not apply

this

technology in current human society.

This

is because the citizens will be put in dangerous situations when the robotic system falls into mafia organisations.