The government should stop spending money on restoration of old buildings. Instead, it should build more houses and improve roads. To what extent do you agree with this statement?
It is commonly argued that the government's budget should be spent on basic infrastructures
such
as building more houses and enhancing the condition of roads
rather than on restoring traditional architecture in the country. I will discuss both sides with examples in this
essay.
To begin
with, it is a considerably persuadable statement that improving fundamental infrastructures are
more urgent. First and foremost, from a practical point of view, houses and Correct subject-verb agreement
is
roads
are more concerned directly with the crowd's life. For example
, should there be abundant numbers of houses people can live in, they would not be as worried as they really are. Not only that, but governments should take care of the condition of roads
, which easily get damaged by vehicles driving on them. What this
means is that governments should spend more money on traffic facilities like roads
so that they can reduce accident rates due to
damaged roads
.
On the other hand
, there are some reasons why we have to keep old buildings
to ourselves. Firstly
, traditional buildings
can be used for many purposes. Not only do the buildings
show the history of the region, but they can also
make a major contribution to the local economy. For instance
, considering the fact that many tourists visit another country to feel their exotic and iconic culture, it cannot be denied that traditional buildings
play an important role in a country's tourism. Furthermore
, those buildings
are symbols that remind people about their ethnic identity. If we were not to take care of those precious treasures any longer, it would definitely be recorded as the hugest mistake we could have ever made.
To conclude
, even though it sounds appropriate to invest more money in infrastructures than traditional buildings
, I somewhat disagree with the statement because I believe that traditional buildings
surely are worth being kept for both us and our descendants.Submitted by johndaegeun on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Task Response
Task Response: The essay discusses both sides of the argument and provides relevant examples, but the position of the writer is not clearly stated.
Coherence and Cohesion
Coherence and Cohesion: The essay lacks a clear logical structure, with some disorganized paragraphs. The introduction and conclusion are present, but the development of ideas needs better organization. Use of cohesive devices can be improved to create better flow and coherence in the essay.