Every year several languages die out. Some people think that this is not important because life will be easier if there are fewer languages in the world. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opnion

Many suppose that a nation's

language

is the representation of that country's culture, and the extinction of these

languages

could result in absence of the culture they associate with.

Hence

,

language

plays a vital role in the preservation of a nation's culture.

However

, the modern world and globalization are becoming increasingly faster and a massive amount of

communication

needs to be processed instantly, to avoid delay and misinterpretation in

communication

and ensure a common accurate understanding across the globe. And examining the illustrations for the above points of view will reveal my agreement with the statement. On the one hand, it is not uncommon that a wide range of

languages

causes misinterpretation or delay in conversation.

For example

, research findings proved that bilinguists tend to be slower than people who talk only in their mother tongues in recognizing one word.

Hence

, it is likely to lead to disrupted information exchange. In some scenarios, those who speak or hear in a foreign

language

in a meeting may not entirely grasp the ideas of the presenter, which leads to misinterpretation. Sometimes,

this

results in a possible vast financial loss.

Therefore

, if the world community all speak the same

language

, misunderstanding is less likely to happen and

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

conversation would be much easier.

On the other hand

, lessening the diversity of

languages

helps bring people around the world closer.

For instance

, more clear and understandable

communication

is generated among many people as they do not need to input significant effort or cost more time to come up with a suitable lexical resource when they enter a talk.

Moreover

, these talkers can better comprehend each other when

language

is no longer a barrier as they speak the same

language

.

In addition

, it

subsequently

enhances the mutual bonding among talkers. In short, a vast range of lingual sources would tend to produce more confusion and enlarge the gap between communicators.

This

results in my solid agreement with the absence of some minor

languages

which are deemed unnecessary to achieve a mutually transparent interpretation in

communication

worldwide.