In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your opinion.

Many people in different countries say it is necessary to spare almost money to upgrade
railway
lines to improve the velocity of
trains
transiting between metropolis. But the other stand on the idea money must be spent on enhancing the current public transport. On the
one
hand, building a new
railway
system
is better than enhancing the exist because when building a new
system
can bring numerous benefits. The
first
is a new
system
that comes up with the newest technology.
For instance
, magnet railways or ultrasonic
trains
can travel faster than traditional
trains
. The
second
benefit is that deploying new
railway
lines can not interrupt existing
train
systems because building a new
one
means we do not inherit the existing
train
line, so the old
train
can run while we build a new
one
.
On the other hand
, Improving an existing public transport
system
might be cost-saving and make the existing
system
reusable. We can extend and reuse the old
system
for the
next
generation by fixing existing railroad systems.
For instance
, If we reuse the old rails, they will be able to reuse the old parts that are still operating,
thus
reducing costs and avoiding wasting money. According to my perspective, deploying a new faster railroad
system
is better than enhancing existing infrastructure for several reasons. The
first
is the new
system
can help to create many jobs for the worker to minimize the jobless problems. The
second
one
is that building a new infrastructure is the best way to connect the cities of a country because a new
system
can allow multiple
trains
to connect together in the transfer centre, allowing travellers to switch between
trains
more easily. In conclusion, many people consider building a new
railway
system
instead
of improving the existing but we needed to consider many aspects after choosing a plan to build a high-speed
train
.
Submitted by thinhle.ict on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • infrastructure
  • efficient
  • congestion
  • sustainable
  • environmentally friendly
  • connectivity
  • economic growth
  • public transportation
What to do next:
Look at other essays: