Some people say that increasing prices of petrol is the best way to reduce traffic jams and pollution. Do you agree or disagree?

The importance of minimising carbon emissions for the environment was always debatable and now has become more controversial. Many people claim that the high fare of

petrol

will reduce movement and its

pollution

while others reject

this

notion. In my opinion, the latter preposition appears more rational in

this

piece of an essay. I will elaborate on the reason and

thus

lead to a logical conclusion. There are myriad of reasons which will

further

explain

this

argument but the most preponderant stems from the fact that

petrol

is not only used for personal vehicles. it is

also

used in public transportation and other facilities

also

. The main problem of traffic jams and

pollution

is single-vehicle usage of vehicles. If individuals prefer public transportation it will automatically reduce the traffic and

pollution

content from the

air

. Another pivotal aspect of

this

trend is that if the government will increase the price of

petrol

it will straightly hit poor people who can not manage to travel on public transport due to the high rise in

petrol

prices and which will

also

impact travel on public transport. Elaborating my viewpoint, there are more demerits but one of the crucial effects is that the higher price of

petrol

will lead fluctuate demand and supply of products and food items. Transportation industries are highly dependent on

petrol

if it is raised by the government

then

automatically affects every common man.

Besides

, the higher prices government should reduce the consumption of factories'

air

abuse and charge them for polluting high values of poisoned

air

. According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach the conclusion that the drawbacks of reducing the face of

petrol

are indeed too high. Authority should come up with other sources to prevent

air

pollution

and traffic jam.