International tourist should pay more than the local visitor for cultural and historical attractions? Do you agree or disagree

Many believe that foreigners should be charged higher prices for local goods and scenic places in comparison to natives. I agree with the aforementioned statement and the same has been discussed in the below paragraphs. Tourism is a vital industry for an economy and helps in generating higher revenues for the central government.

Firstly

, India is a diverse country and is enriched with heritage and aesthetic places.

Furthermore

, artisans have spent years learning the tactics for producing articles from their previous generations which reflect the Indian culture deeply

therefore

these things hold not only materialistic value but sentimental value as well. Foreign tourists have limited access to

such

products in their own countries and

hence

are charged higher prices for these commodities.

For instance

- Khadi is a fabric

that is

woven over wheels and is prominently used in India

therefore

is an expensive fabric for international pupils.

Secondly

, the existence of different values of the currency plays a vital role in charging

such

competitive prices from foreign tourists as they have better spending capacity in comparison to the local people of India. To exemplify, a dollar is an expensive currency in comparison to the Indian rupee and

thus

charging a higher value would not be a burden on foreigners' pockets. To summarize, the tourism industry helps in boosting wealthy treasures as well as introduces the world to a nation's arts and offerings. Even though these articles are invaluable in nature yet they are sold so that the standard of living could be improved.

Moreover

, keeping in view the interest of foreign folks, official authorities have various mechanisms to regulate

this

industry.