Some people think young people should be required to have full-time education until they are at least 18 years old. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some believe that it is mandatory, for children to go through full-time studies until they are 18 years old. While admitting it is a must for every young

person

to get an education, I strongly believe that it should be a mix of both

work

and knowledge. the majority of the school systems in the world depend on books for knowledge which is alarming.

Firstly

, most teachers assume that a child can be successful when he is a subject expert.

In addition

to

this

, most education systems in Asia define a bright student from the higher marks that they get for question

paper

Fix the agreement mistake

papers

show examples

rather than the

experience

.

For example

, the European system enables students to

work

part-time at the latter stage so that they can acquire practical

experience

on how to

work

in an organization which ultimately helps them to understand the working ethics of teamwork and culture. The current global market requires people with both IQ and EQ.

To begin

with, it is very rare that school systems will produce opportunities to improve a

person

's soft skills paroral to studies.

For example

, 70 per cent of the blue chip companies in Sweden want to recruit people who are coming out of universities who possess prior

experience

in dealing with a working environment.

Furthermore

, researchers have proven that the probability of adapting to a working culture

who

Correct word choice

and

show examples

have

Wrong verb form

having

show examples

previous

experience

is higher than a

person

who only has academics. In conclusion, it is obvious that the world trend is moving away from academics to practitioners very quickly

hence

I strongly believe that a young

person

must be given the opportunity to both

work

and study at the latter part of their school to be a potential candidate to quickly to get a job.