Should the government support artists, such as, musicians, writers, and painters? Is it economically beneficial or is it just a waste of money? Why or why not?

In contemporary society,it is argued whether the

government

helps artists like singers,writers,composers and painters or not.Is it advantageous or not in terms of finances? Above all,it is irrefutable that the artists represent their own

countries

' cultures all over the world by attending festivals and concerts.It is one of the best ways in order to tempt many foreigners to visit their

countries

.

In other words

,with the help of musicians and ,singers the

government

has a chance to boost its economy.

Furthermore

,authorities can organize carnivals in their own regions and invite musicians who are famous and from different

countries

.

This

will trigger many visitors to travel to

this

region.

For instance

, Italy is one of the most visited

countries

in the world thanks to its musical background.

That is

why having professional composers and singers enable the

government

to take advantage of it.

Additionally

,it is

also

undeniable that the officials support the editors and painters in order to print their hand-writings or exhibit their paintings worldwide.

This

will have a positive impact on the economy because when the novelists get supported financially,they will be able to introduce their stories and novels throughout the world.To exemplify my opinion,nowadays there are a few writers in my country who are well-known in Europe

hence

they sell thousands of books each year.As a consequence,the

government

takes advantage of it by imposing taxes.

Therefore

,it is necessary to subside the cultural workers. To conclude,the

government

has a lot of benefits economically from supporting artists

such

as musicians,painters and so on because of the above-mentioned reasons.