Students should be taught academic knowledge so that they can pass exams, and skills such as cooking, dressing.... should not be taught. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is often argued what kind of education should be given to students.

Although

the benefits of the lessons like math, literature, or biology are easily seen sometimes people tend to ignore the impact of learning everyday

life

skills

such

as cooking or dressing.

This

essay will explore arguments for both sides of the discussion and provide a detailed analysis to readers. Schools must provide good academic lessons like math, history, or physics but the aim of

this

goal should not be passing the exam or getting an A+ on their exam result which won’t be useful in real

life

. The purpose should be to teach them to think rationally or be more precise with their past or be aware of how nature works.

However

using exams could be useful to help kids to learn because, without any force, they won’t be motivated to learn these hard topics

such

as algebra or the laws of Newton.

On the other hand

, a lot of successful people reached their goals because of their soft

skills

not because they were good at getting a perfect score on every exam. School

also

must be a place to gain the abilities from easy tasks, it might seem not useful at the beginning

however

these kinds of chores have the potential to teach something. One clear example is that while doing the laundry, a person learns how to organize and become better with their time management

skills

. In conclusion, children spend most of their time in classes, listening to the teacher which plays an important role in their

life

but another option could take them outside of the classroom and help them to gain soft

skills

which are harder to ignore the benefits in both daily and business

life

.