The government should pay to the parents of very young children, so that one of them can stay at home and look after their children.What do you think are the pros and cons of this policy? Justify your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

These days, in many families, both

parents

work outside of the

home

, and some believe that governments should support them financially so that one of them can take

care

of their

children

.

This

has some advantages and disadvantages. There are several advantages if

children

are looked after by their

parents

. It is important that mothers take

care

of their

children

during the

first

two years because

this

can help

children

with feeling secure.

In other words

, if they are taken to nurseries, they may feel stressed as everything is new for them.

In addition

, when

parents

stay at

home

, it is more likely that the parent-child relationship becomes stronger as

parents

have more opportunities to play and communicate with their

children

.

Nevertheless

, paying

parents

to stay

home

and take

care

of their

children

can bring out some problems. Many countries can not afford

this

budget. There are struggling with some more significant issues which have priorities.

For example

, some governments have difficulties in providing drinking water and health

care

for their citizens. In my view, the authorities should focus on meeting their citizens’ essential needs, and assigning a budget to pay

parents

does not come

first

. To sum up, it seems to me that supporting families to have a chance to stay at

home

and take

care

of their

children

is beneficial to have mentally healthy

children

and a strong bond among family members.

However

, it can cause some financial issues for some governments because they have a shortage of budget.