Some say that rich countries should help poor countries with food and education. Do you agree or disagree? Give reasons for your answer and include examples from your experience.

It is argued by many that wealthy

nations

should help poor

nations

with basic amenities like food and

education

.

However

, some are of the opinion that

this

will eventually lead to internal conflict between

countries

. I completely agree that rich

nations

should provide these amenities as it will not only result in good relations between

countries

but

also

enable profit in long run.

Firstly

, everyone wants to live in harmony and maintain good relations with others and the same goes for

countries

. Helping poorer

nations

will eventually build good terms with each other and the world will rise to a healthier and more educated place. If every country thinks in a similar fashion and there will be no war and may be no requirement for large armies.

For example

, India on many occasions has helped its neighbouring

countries

and provided basic facilities.

Secondly

, wealthy

countries

can

also

consider

this

help as a long-term investment. Accessibility to food and

education

for not-very-fortunate

countries

will be counted as an act of favour, and in long run, it can give amazing returns. Big

countries

can extradite invaluable resources from them and use them to their advantage for multifold returns.

Additionally

, with

education

, people will become skilled and rise to significant positions in these rich

countries

.

For Instance

, the United States of America has helped many

nations

with their basic needs and used other

countries

' resources for its own profit. To conclude, big rich

nations

should help

countries

in need with food and

education

as every human deserves basic rights and to bring harmony to the world.

Although

this

will be expensive, it can be considered an investment for the future.