All cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?

Concerns about the environment have increased over the years, and recently, some have stated that

fossil-fuel

Use synonyms

-based

cars

Use synonyms

should be banned and replaced by electric ones, leading to intense discussions. I disagree with

this

Linking Words

very extreme measure.

Fossil-fuel

Use synonyms

cars

Use synonyms

still predominate over electric

cars

Use synonyms

these days. Prohibiting

people

Use synonyms

from using these would generate two significant problems.

First

Linking Words

,

people

Use synonyms

would have to figure out what to do with their previous vehicles.

Second

Linking Words

, most countries would not be able to support

such

Linking Words

a large-scale

change

Use synonyms

. Most

people

Use synonyms

need help figuring out what to do with their previous

cars

Use synonyms

. If

people

Use synonyms

are restricted from using their current vehicles, some will attempt to buy a model with permission to run.

In contrast

Linking Words

, others will resort to public

transportation

Use synonyms

or alternative methods

such

Linking Words

as bicycles. In any of these situations, a vehicle that would still be good for

use

Use synonyms

would be stuck in

people

Use synonyms

’s garages or landfills. Even if there were financial incentives from companies when trading in

fossil-fuel

Use synonyms

cars

Use synonyms

for electric

cars

Use synonyms

and they could

use

Use synonyms

some of the older car’s parts in the new ones, there would be a plethora of other unused pieces.

This

Linking Words

would result in pollution.

For instance

Linking Words

, if I were not allowed to

use

Use synonyms

my current car, I would probably switch to public

transportation

Use synonyms

as my financial state would not allow me to buy an electric vehicle. My car would most likely stay in the garage and go to a landfill later. I would inevitably pollute the environment anyways. Most countries need to be well structured for a large-scale

change

Use synonyms

in energy sources and large

use

Use synonyms

of public

transportation

Use synonyms

. Replacing

fossil-fuel

Use synonyms

cars

Use synonyms

with electric

cars

Use synonyms

could take

time

Use synonyms

as companies would probably wait to attend to high demand.

This

Linking Words

would give governments

time

Use synonyms

to increase the energy supply in response to

this

Linking Words

change

Use synonyms

.

However

Linking Words

, public

transportation

Use synonyms

would only be able to adjust slowly. The influx of passengers would exponentially grow; buses and trains would be constantly full, and

time

Use synonyms

for commute would increase. In the long term,

people

Use synonyms

would immigrate to larger cities to be closer to their workplaces, leading to an overpopulation of these areas and inhabitation problems.

For instance

Linking Words

, in Greater Vancouver, individuals who live outside Vancouver take about thirty to fifty minutes to reach work by car and between fifty to one hour and a half by bus to get to Vancouver Downtown, where many companies are located. These numbers would probably increase to the extent that these

people

Use synonyms

would have to leave their houses much sooner, leaving little

time

Use synonyms

for leisure and other activities. In conclusion, banning

fossil-fuel

Use synonyms

cars

Use synonyms

and replace with electric ones could generate great difficulties for individuals and society. While

people

Use synonyms

would need to learn what to do with the prohibited vehicles, governments would have to rush and develop an infrastructure of public

transportation

Use synonyms

that they currently do not have to appropriately respond to a considerable

change

Use synonyms

as the one proposed.