Society is based on rules and laws. It could not function if individuals were free to do whatever they wanted. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

The advancement of

society

has motivated the establishment of laws and regulations. Opinions are divergent regarding their importance in preventing

society

from devolving into anarchy. Laws and regulations are instrumental in maintaining essential social functions. Proponents of an ungoverned

society

espouse the precedence of individual autonomy and pursuits of self-interest over collective benefits.

Nonetheless

, lawlessness would inspire individual propensity for malevolence and misdeeds, namely criminal activity, violence and terrorism, which could inflict enormous suffering and damage. Within the boundaries of tacit social contract obligation,

such

destructive acts violate codes of ethics and morality.

This

is primarily because the autonomy of the individual should be balanced with the rights of the group – all individuals in

society

should have equal rights to live peacefully.

Consequently

, lawful curtailment of individual freedom through criminal punishments, including imprisonment or fines, advances in forensic science and prevalent surveillance cameras, is necessary for regulating primal instincts, deterring criminal behaviours and maintaining societal stability. Proponents of a lawless

society

also

cite the maximization of individual financial and political benefits.

Nevertheless

, the absence of legal systems would grant businesses unrestricted permission regarding their operation, which would invariably engender environmental devastation and depletion of natural resources.

This

is evidenced by the Chinese government’s lack of stringent regulations on coal extraction in China, eventuating in companies depleting coal reserves and decreasing air quality resulting

to

Change preposition

in

show examples

severe pollution. Another justification for a lawful

society

involves scientific research. Provided no restrictive legislation on nuclear weapons, nations would conduct research and be predisposed toward nuclear wars for gaining political power, potentially presenting existential threats to humanity. In conclusion, judicial systems are paramount to protecting individuals in

society

and maintaining social order.

Hence

, a

society

devoid of strictures imposed by legislation is a dystopian one rife with crime, unrest, immorality and destruction.