Nowadays animal experiments are widely used to develop new medicines and to test the safety of other products. Some people argue that these experiments should be banned because it is morally wrong to cause animals to suffer, while others are in favour of them because of their benefits to humanity. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

It is true that some organizations leverage animal

experiments

to attain medical data and improve drugs. While some people think that making

experiments

on live

animals

leads them to pain and

thus

should be abolished, I argue that

this

strategy is an indispensable part of medical development and drug designs. We should recognize that

animals

often suffer from pain during these

experiments

, which is immoral and negative from the perspective of nature and the ecosystem. In the drug design phase, doctors or professors always choose a monkey as the object and conduct some ablation study on them due to the similarity between humans and monkeys.

However

, there is no doubt that

animals

should experience multi-rounds studies, and operators record their reactions. From the individual's aspect, doing activities like that seems to be unacceptable and immoral. From the natural aspect, large-scale animal

experiments

easily lead to species decreases and

further

degrade the balance and stability of the ecosystem.

However

, regardless of the above arguments, I consider that animal

experiments

are essential to the medical field and cannot be replaced by other alternatives.

Firstly

, since human organs have similar structures and functions to monkeys or other

animals

, researchers can receive relatively real results and data by looking at

animals

. In later phases, people can modify the structure of drugs in labs and adjust the dose of medication when they treat the patients. Meanwhile, despite the effectiveness, animal

experiments

also

contain convenience and fewer investments. There are some examples that developed countries have mastered techniques that need not

animals

in medical studies, while they choose to not adopt

this

method due to its high consumption. In conclusion, it seems to me that it would be more negative to ban testing on

animals

for fair medical research until some cheap and effective alternatives have been developed.