Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

House

is a fundamental necessity of humans. Some have argued that living in a landed

house

is better than a skyscraper. In my opinion, it is best to stay in a horizontal

city

than a vertical

city

.

However

,

this

essay will explore both aspects and demonstrate why its proponents are correct.

To begin

with, high-rise property can accommodate more

people

. Nowadays it is very difficult to find a place to live in a

city

due to overpopulation.

People

are

also

more likely to get a roof over their heads with the availability of vertical apartments.

For example

, Dubai's tallest building, the Burj Khalifa, can accommodate hundreds of thousands of

people

.

Furthermore

, vertical buildings are

also

much cheaper as compared to wider houses.

For instance

, the price of a detached

house

in Malaysia is twice as much as the price of an apartment.

In addition

, apartments are easy to settle in as problems

such

as garbage and security are handled by the management.

On the other hand

, horizontal houses are usually bigger in space. The public can plant vegetables, flowers, and trees in their housing areas.

This

also

contributes to a greener environment.

Moreover

, a landed

house

is less vulnerable to natural disasters

such

as earthquakes.

For instance

, a few years ago, a tall apartment in Japan collapsed due to an earthquake which resulted in numerous deaths. On top of that, horizontal houses are more convenient for older

people

as they do not need to climb stairs. In conclusion, I believe that

people

have their own preferences in choosing a

house

.

However

, in my opinion, it is best to live in a horizontal

city

than a vertical

city

.