The best way to solve the world’s environmental problem is to increase the price of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

There is an argumentative notion heating up a debate over whether the optimal tactic to solve the global environmental matter is to hike the cost of fuel. I would not regard myself as an advocate of

this

notion. Without a shadow of a doubt, increasing the cost of petroleum is not an ideal approach to dealing with the worldwide environment. Needless to say, because almost all

vehicles

run on gasoline, there is inelastic demand for oil.

Therefore

, even though the

price

of supply is ever-increasing, people still have an insatiable thirst for petrol.

For instance

, in Viet Nam,

although

the government has just raised the

price

of gasoline, citizens are in an unmoving rush to purchase gas because the great demand for going to work and to school is of daily essence. Increasing the

price

of fuel makes no difference in minimizing the utilization of

vehicles

.

Hence

, hiking the cost of gasoline is not an equivalent solution to protect the s. While the ineffective impact of the increase in fuel

price

is widely acknowledged, there is a wealth of more far-reaching alternatives to address environmental issues. Obviously, if most electric

vehicles

run on renewable energy, they will not emit greenhouse gas and negatively affect the air quality of the environment.

For example

, Vinfast is a well-known car maker in Viet Nam which has an eco-friendly electric automobile system.

Therefore

, It meets the needs of people without adversely affecting the air quality.

As a result

, the use of electric

vehicles

is one of the most efficient solutions to reduce toxic exhaust fumes, which can protect the environment. To conclude, the efficacious remedy for environmental contamination should not be raising the

price

of petrol because there is a bunch of other choices that can handle the issue of environmental pollution

such

as using hybrid means of transport.