The effective way to reduce industrial pollution is to tax the companies that cause them. Discuss both views, and give your opinion.

While some argue that

companies

paying taxes for environmental issues caused by them will be productive methods, others opine that they are already in charge of reducing the problems as well as humanly possible. In

this

essay, both sides will be discussed and I believe that the latter opinion seems more plausible.

First

and foremost, industrial

pollution

is beyond what the public is capable of coping with as an individual.

For example

, if there is water

pollution

and citizens have to deal with it, not only is it efficient because they do not have enough time and

money

, but it is

also

almost infeasible to expect them to clean it up professionally.

However

, if the government hire professionals with plenty of

money

that

companies

paid, both efficiency and accuracy will produce a satisfying result.

Thus

,

companies

should take place in reducing

pollution

.

On the other hand

just because

companies

make a great amount of

money

does not necessarily mean that they should be in charge of all environmental issues, some of which they do not even cause.

Furthermore

, many facilities and factories have been encouraged to install purifiers as necessary so that they do not cause

pollution

to begin

with.

For instance

, fumes coming out of factories mostly

compose

Change the form of the verb

composed

show examples

of water vapour that inflicts no damage to humans or nature. In conclusion, since many

companies

are already not involved in any industrial

pollution

that leads to environmental problems, it seems unfair to force them to pay

money

for it.

Therefore

, I completely disagree with

this

opinion despite their financial support will be of great help.