Some believe that traffic problems in cities can best be resolved by investing in urban infrastructure while others feel there are superior solutions. Discuss both sides and give your own opinion.

✨ Do you want to improve your IELTS writing?
Nowadays , it is true to say that traffic
congestions
Fix the agreement mistake
congestion
show examples
become a major problem in most cities. Some individuals believe that constructing more public transportation systems could overcome
this
Linking Words
issue ,
whereas
Linking Words
others claim that another possible solution will be there to solve
this
Linking Words
problem.
This
Linking Words
essay will show both views and
then
Linking Words
I will present my individual concern. On the one hand , many people believe that authorities have to invest in a large number of urban infrastructures
such
Linking Words
as local trains , subways and expressways . There is no doubt that , if
the
Correct article usage
apply
show examples
public
transportations
Fix the agreement mistake
transportation
show examples
are
Correct subject-verb agreement
is
show examples
affordable and reliable for citizens , they will definitely travel by those systems.
Consequently
Linking Words
, commuting areas will be reduced and governments could
also
Linking Words
easy to
Replace the word
easily
show examples
manage all the traffic from their control centres.
However
Linking Words
, initial costs for those systems will be expensive and many city administrators could not achieve
this
Linking Words
goal.
On the other hand
Linking Words
, some opponents feel that administrators ought to improve current traffic rules and regulations rather than spending a lot of money on cities' infrastructures. Obviously , authorities could limit private
own
Correct word choice
apply
show examples
vehicles
Fix the agreement mistake
vehicle
show examples
usage and encourage eco-friendly travelling like bicycling .
As a result
Linking Words
, the public could obtain health benefits
as well as
Linking Words
fewer carbon emissions into their surroundings.
Although
Linking Words
the main idea is good enough , it would be difficult to participate by the public ,especially in large metropolitan areas.
To conclude
Linking Words
, as I mentioned above , both views have their own advantages and disadvantages . In my humble opinion , we have to be balanced between these two views. We need to construct new infrastructures
as well as
Linking Words
encourage to use of new regulations to control commuting in our cities.
Submitted by waiphyothu007 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

task response
Ensure that all points directly correspond to the task prompt. Make sure to address the specific instructions given in the prompt and provide arguments for both sides of the issue.
coherence and cohesion
Use more advanced cohesive devices and transitions to improve the logical flow and connectivity of ideas within paragraphs and throughout the essay.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • urban infrastructure
  • traffic congestion
  • bottlenecks
  • public transportation systems
  • cycling lanes
  • pedestrian pathways
  • telecommuting
  • smart traffic management
  • AI and IoT
  • carpooling
  • ride-sharing services
  • vehicular traffic
  • alternative means of transport
What to do next:
Look at other essays: