In some countries, there has been an increase in adverstisements that try to persuade children to buy snacks, toys and other items. Parents often argue that these announcements are unfair. Discuss both perspectives and give your opinion?

In

this

contemporary epoch, the influence of publicity campaigns on

children

has become a controversial argument. Whilst some proponents emphasize that these adverts play a salient role in their lives, some opponents and I adopt a diverse stance because they have to be outlawed as they mislead

children

. In

this

essay, both views, along with my perspective will be

further

elaborated. To embark on, despite agreeing with the view that advertisements have a deleterious effect on offspring, some advocates discern that they are crucial to raising the awareness of teenagers.

This

means that when celebrities participate in awareness-raising campaigns, more young people will be protected from wrong directions. An eminent example of

this

is Mo Salah who launched an anti-drug campaign which has encouraged youth to contact anti-drug agencies.

Therefore

, what can be said is that commercials have a constructive role in youth's alertness.

Nevertheless

, some food commercials are directly targeting

children

, and they have to be banned.

In other words

, if adverts use

children

's favourite cartoon characters, they will crave these snacks and take excessive bites.

This

can be witnessed by the Nutella advert which produces an illusive image regarding its ingredients as being healthy

although

it is loaded with palm oils and refined sugars.

Accordingly

, in a final analysis, a plethora of

children

suffer from obesity and diabetes

as a result

of unethical adverts. In conclusion, after

this

essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that publicities are double-edged swords. Eventually, I am a staunch believer that without food publicities, could not have been suffering.