Computers are being used more and more in education and so there will be no role of the teacher in education. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Nowadays, the use of technology is increasing constantly everywhere. One

such

field is education which uses and benefits

computers

. I completely disagree with the statement that

computers

will replace human teachers in the future. The inability of a technology-driven

teacher

to motivate

students

and make them disciplined explains the reasons.

To begin

with, a robotic

teacher

is not capable of providing the proper care, attention and motivation that a student needs. To clarify,

computers

are simply machines, which cannot react according to the situation.

As a result

, scholars who need special attention and inspiration may become unrecognised and it will result in the under-development of that particular child.

For instance

, a student who needs more explanation on a specific topic can ask his/her human

teacher

to elaborate on it once again or he/she can meet that

teacher

after the class.

However

,

this

is not practical in the case of a computer-driven

teacher

.

Furthermore

, a computer will be a failure in the classroom to make the

students

calm and quiet. To be precise,

students

especially in primary classes are hyperactive and always makes sound and runs all around during

class

Add an article

the class

show examples

time. It is impossible for a computer to tackle

this

situation like a

teacher

. To illustrate, a study conducted by

Teacher

Trainees at MG University, Kerala depicted that

students

are noisy when they are in computer labs without their

teacher

. To sum up, I reiterate that I completely disagree with the argument that

computers

will take the role of a

teacher

in the future since they are unable to handle and guide

students

properly.

Hence

, it is hopeful that the Government will take an adequate decision on the use of

computers

in the field of education in the days to come.