Some people think that vertical city is the best, where people live and work in a tall building. Others think that horizontal city is better. What is your opinion.

A house is a basic social requirement. Some have argued that living in a landed house is better than a skyscraper. In my opinion, I believe that high-rise buildings are better.

This

essay will explore both aspects and demonstrate why its proponents are correct.

To begin

with, high-rise property can accommodate more

people

. Nowadays, it is very difficult to find a place to live in a city due to overpopulation.

People

are more likely to get a roof over their heads with the availability of vertical apartments.

For example

, Dubai's tallest building, the Burj Khalifa, can accommodate hundreds of thousands of

people

.

Furthermore

, vertical buildings are

also

much cheaper as compared to wider

houses

.

For instance

, the price of detached

houses

in Malaysia is twice as much as the price of apartments.

In addition

, apartments are easy to settle into as problems

such

as garbage and security are handled by the management. Horizontal

houses

,

on the other hand

, are typically larger in size.

People

can plant vegetables, flowers, and trees in their housing areas.

This

also

contributes to a greener environment.

Moreover

, landed

houses

are less vulnerable to natural disasters

such

as earthquakes.

For instance

, a few years ago, a tall apartment in Japan collapsed due to an earthquake and causing numerous deaths. On top of that, horizontal

houses

are more convenient for older

people

as they do not need to climb stairs.

This

is especially true when elevators in high-rise buildings break down. In conclusion, I believe that

people

have their own preferences when choosing a house.

However

, in my opinion, it is better to live in a vertical city than a horizontal city.