In some countries, secondary education focuses in depth on two or three subjects, while in others students take a large number of subjects. Which system do you think is better?

In

this

contemporary epoch, the debate over whether or not studying nonessential materials is beneficial. Whilst some proponents emphasize that schools should mainly focus on scientific

subjects

, some opponents and I adopt a diverse stance because non-core materials rekindle the imagination of teenagers and raise their cultural awareness. In

this

essay, my contention will be

further

elaborated. To embark on, despite many guardians

discern

Wrong verb form

discerning

show examples

that learning music, art and theatre may hinder their dependents from spending ample time studying physics and biology, these courses are able to increase the intelligence and soft skills of young people.

This

means that when students become exposed to various kinds of sciences,

this

will broaden their horizons. An eminent example of

this

is a study conducted by Cairo University which has revealed that students who get acquainted with the symphonies of Mozart have shown more development in their interpersonal skills.

Therefore

, what can be said is that learning subsidiary courses is quintessential for teenagers' development.

Furthermore

, thanks to secondary

subjects

, youth have had a significant cultural awareness.

In other words

, if young males and females are introduced to

history

classes to a high extent, they will have a sense of cultural identity to combat

cultural

Add an article

the cultural

show examples

invasion.

This

can be witnessed by international schools in Egypt which consider

history

a core material, and

this

has led to more historical comprehension.

Accordingly

, in a final analysis, secondary

subjects

such

as

history

cannot be neglected. In conclusion, after

this

essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that not only does focusing on two or three main

subjects

prevent learners from acquiring crucial skills, but

also

this

poses a threat to the recognition of culture and

history

. Eventually, I am a staunch believer that without subsidiary courses, youth could not have been sharp-witted.