It is now possible for scientists and tourists to travel to remote natural environment, such as the South Pole. Do the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages?
It is true that people, including scientists and tourists, can easily access off-the-beaten-track places like the South Pole these days. Yet, individuals hold polarized views on whether
this
technological advancement is beneficial or not. On a more personal level, I believe that the advantages of this
attitude outweigh its disadvantages.
On the one hand, there are some beliefs among people worldwide that paving the way has detrimentally been influencing the environmental preservation of remote natural environments. The first reason is that this
group highly debates that climate and ecosystem changes are rooted in the scientists' experiments and tourists' recreations. In other words
, because of sampling for scientific research, the genes of local habitats may be manipulated, as well as
hustling and bustling are more likely to result in deforestation and water contamination. Additionally
, those who will have been undertaking expeditions in the remote wilderness, where they litter, set a fire, and so forth, are capable of jeopardizing the beauty of this
untouched region.
However
, I would argue that these sorts of tourism industry and exploration should be allowed as much as possible. Firstly
, we can effectively increase our encyclopedia of knowledge. In this
regard, thanks to social networks, satellites, and online websites, natural fans themselves find it easy to see these picturesque views and read scientific articles through those who are travellers and researchers, respectively. Secondly
, economic benefits and commercialization can potentially appear as a blessing in disguise. For example
, travelling and going on an excursion in this
harsh environment requires related companies that will have to recruit staff and employees. So, some companies and job seekers are profited, both directly and indirectly. It is undeniable that if there are no leaders and companies, adventurists and explorers will not see these places efficiently.
In conclusion, although
some people would like to not drop the subject of outnumbering drawbacks of this
development, it seems to me that not only is this
theory not acceptable but also
this
attitude should strongly be supported.Submitted by TUTOO on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this siteβs author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
While your essay presents a clear argument, using more specific examples and evidence to support your points would strengthen your task response.
coherence cohesion
Some sentences are a bit complex and may confuse the reader. Try simplifying or breaking them into shorter sentences for clearer comprehension.
coherence cohesion
Ensure each main point within a paragraph directly supports your overall argument, as this will enhance logical flow.
coherence cohesion
You have a clear introduction and conclusion that frames your essay effectively, enhancing the coherence.
task achievement
Your essay addresses both sides of the argument, which is important for a balanced task response.
task achievement
The essay maintains a consistent focus on the topic, showing an understanding of the task.