Some people argue that the government should give every unemployed person a mobile phone and should make sure they have access to the Internet. They believe this is the best way of using public money to reduce the problem of unemployment. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Unemployment persons have been a well-discussed topic recently. Many

people

think that governments should deliver mobile phones to

this

part of

society

.

Nonetheless

, others claim that these kinds of actions won't be useful. In

this

essay, I am going to explain both points of view along with my personal opinion. On one hand, I believe these measures can help

people

who don´t get a formal job. Giving a public phone may benefit a lot of

people

that cannot afford one.

For instance

: In poor ,countries it will be good if the government grants public assent

such

as phones, personal computers and books with the objective to develop job skills in these

people

.

In other words

, I think

this

may help

society

to increase their abilities to get a better life

On the other hand

, using public money for

people

has several disadvantages due to

people

won´t have incentives to get a job.

Besides

, the government should reduce taxes and regulations, in

fact

Add a comma

,fact

show examples

is well-known in nations where taxes have been lowered, unemployment has fallen.

This

produces wages that have risen and members of

society

have benefited. Other disadvantages are nobody will have the motive to buy their things by themselves so

this

would harm the regional economy of these nations. To conclude,

although

public spending has advantages that can really offer a solution to unemployed

people

and

also

a better life in our

society

, the downsides of these measures won´t change the life of

people

and even their economy will be worse. It is for these reasons that the drawbacks outweigh the benefits