In many places new homes are needed, but the only space availble for building them is in the contryside. Some people believe it is more important to protect the countryside and not build new homes there. What is your opinion about this.
In general, from
time
to time
the population of the country is going uprise drastically. As a result
, competition for a square meter which is suitable for living on the earth, in simple words " land size" is also
being gained. To address this
lack of building spaces many believe the main answer is the remote areas
that are used for houses. In my opinion, rural areas
with sufficient wildlife are not suitable for new human settlements. It could be caused by global warming as well as wild-life human conflict.
At first
, most of the untouched areas
consisted of a high percentage of fauna and flora. Not only plants but also
animal species are rare in special areas
areas
or in the country. Remove the redundancy
apply
Therefore
establishing new projects could Leeds to the end of wildlife life. At the same time
, which will result
more complex situation for the country and even for the world. Add the preposition
inresult
fromresult
On the other hand
, deforestation, excavation, and fire-rising directly lead to rising global warming and the destruction of water sources. In fact, this
situation could be worst. If we try to use the remote area for housing.
Second
, regional areas
that have been built houses earlier were not successful projects. Because implement humans in remote areas
get connected to wild animals closely. It is a developed wildlife-human conflict that harms both humans and animals. Dangerous animals such
as Elephants, and monkeys are more likely to attack outside people and properties as well. At the same time
, some kinds of zoonotic diseases also
can be transmitted to humans. Take example rabies and tuberculosis. Which is reduced the quality of life of people living in the countryside
. Therefore
better not to build houses in the countryside
.
In conclusion, due to usage of the countryside
by human beings, cause the reduction of fauna and flora, increases in global warming and human-wildlife conflict. Thus
it is not suitable to destroy the countryside
for housing.Submitted by Parakramagunathilaka on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
