SOME PEOPLE FEEL THAT THERE SHOUD BE A FIXED PUNISHMENT FOR EACH TYPE OF CRIME. OTHERS FOT THAT THE CIRUMSTANCES OF AN OFFENCE SHOULD BE TAKEN IN TO ACCOUNT WHEN DECIDING ON A PUNISHMENT. DISCUSS BOTHE SIDES AND GIVE YOUR OWN OPINION.

Crimes are punished throughout the world.Some countries have evolved their laws to be a bit more considerate where the conditions in which a

crime

is committed are considered,rather than

one

punishment for all.A school of thought opposing

this

idea believe the same penalty may induce fear reducing the

crime

rate.But in my opinion,

this

is a positive development and states should consider the scenario so that they may not punish people who did not

a

Correct the article-noun agreement

apply

show examples

bad intentions. On the

one

hand,some people believe in the same punishment for an offence regardless of the reason behind it.

Such

strict rules create fear among the criminals,that they would face the same harsh punishments as others if they thought of doing

such

a thing.In some cases

this

strategy has been successful

for example

,Saudi Arabia has

this

kind of rule where violations are punished regardless of the circumstances and have been successful so far.

Thus

, the same penalty for violation leads to fear which may do away with

crime

.

On the other hand

,the other school of thought opines that the

state

should be motherly and must consider the circumstances where the

crime

was committed.In some ,cases an individual is forced to commit a

crime

,even though he did not want to.

For instance

,a murderer who caught the headlines in the news

,

Remove the comma

apply

show examples

was forced to murder because his family was kidnapped.If the

state

does not consider

the

Correct article usage

apply

show examples

such

a

state

of affairs,

then

it would have to punish the person who willingly killed someone and the

one

who had no choice,with the same scale which is not fair.

Hence

,the authorities should not turn a blind eye towards the situation and should treat violations

accordingly

. In my opinion,the idea to look into the situation where a law is broken must be upheld

instead

of

one

shoe fits all.

This

is because by turning a blind eye towards the scenario,an innocent man who did not have the intention to commit a

crime

may suffer.

Therefore

,I support looking into the

state

of affairs where a law is violated before punishment. To conclude,

one

group of people supports penalizing every offender on the same scale.

Nevertheless

,I believe that courts should look deeply into the scenarios so that someone who did a violation under pressure may be given a chance to restart with a clean slate.