Scientific innovation is always a positive thing and should be encouraged. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give reasons to support your answer.
People are on
the
split decision Correct article usage
a
whether
to promote scientific innovations. Change preposition
on whether
Although
some scientific innovation
leads to detrimental
Add an article
a detrimental
the detrimental
situation
, Fix the agreement mistake
situations
it
should still be promoted, as Correct pronoun usage
they
its
advantages drive Correct pronoun usage
their
the
human development.
On one hand, Correct article usage
apply
innovation
in science is vital to enhance human’s
life. Scientific discoveries have benefited people from simple saving-labour Change noun form
human
machine
, Fix the agreement mistake
machines
such
as microwave
, to Fix the agreement mistake
microwaves
a
great Correct article usage
apply
accomplishment
, like Fix the agreement mistake
accomplishments
moon
landing. If, Add an article
the moon
a moon
for example
, scientists
had not done more innovations in space research, Add an article
a human
the human
human
might never have set foot on the moon, and people may have no microwave in their kitchen todayFix the agreement mistake
humans
,
since microwave was developed from the so-called unimportant discovery when Remove the comma
apply
the
Correct article usage
apply
scientists
built a space rocket. From these cases, it is vivid that scientific innovation
is crucial for mankind.
Aside from the advantages, scientific
invention could lead to a negative situation, if there was no moral ethics to Add an article
the scientific
compass
how mankind Change the article
the compass
use
it. Atomic Change the verb form
uses
bomb
in Fix the agreement mistake
bombs
the
World War II and poisonous gas in Correct article usage
apply
the
World War I are Correct article usage
apply
the
examples of how a brilliant breakthrough in science could lead to a Correct article usage
apply
catastrophy
. One can argue that it is Correct your spelling
catastrophe
the
human who Correct article usage
apply
decide
whether to amplify the positive or negative side of the invention. Change the verb form
decides
However
, if this
situation continues, a similar nightmare will likely to
occur in the future. Fix the infinitive
apply
Therefore
, scientists
and countries have to agree on rules to regulate how these technologies use.
To sum up, mankind has benefited from scientific innovation
to improve their living conditions and accomplish wonders, therefore
, it should still be encouraged. However
, some innovations were transformed into killing machine
. Fix the agreement mistake
machines
Thus
, scientists
and countries will have to generate a set of rules if no one want
to intensify the negative side of scientific inventions.Change the verb form
wants
Submitted by misstiasclassroom on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
Your opinion
Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.
If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.
Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.
Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:
...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?