Scientists and technologists are seems to be more valued in society than artists and muscians in what extent do you agree?

Deciding which profession is of utmost importance in

society

is always a topic of debate. While some believe that artists and musicians are valuable as they provide creative expression of voice, I maintain that

scientists

and technologists are more valuable for the betterment of

society

. In

this

essay, I will argue that

scientists

and technologists are essential professionals for the development and advancement of

society

. The development of civilization as a whole is dependent on the advancement made through

science

and

technology

as it is driven by professionals

such

as

scientists

and engineers. These professionals work hard under uncertain conditions to create solutions for problems, both known and unknown, affecting

society

.

As a result

of

this

, the whole community evolves and gets access to better living conditions.

For example

, the recent

science

and technological advancement in the field of medicine is evidence of the value addition provided by

scientists

and technological experts. Certainly, art is a medium of expression, which has historically been used by artists and musicians in various forms to express their voices. Yet, the role of art and music in the community is limited to being the voice of a culture, plus a source of entertainment.

Besides

, the human life value addition created by these professions is considerably less compared to mainstream professions in

science

and

technology

. In conclusion, a community requires multiple sectors (

such

as arts, music,

science

and

technology

) to thrive, it always values one higher than the other. Clearly, the above discourse argued that

society

values the contributions made by

science

and

technology

more than art and music.