Some governments have banned smoking in all public places. Do agree or disagree?

Nowadays, smoking in public fields is the most significant air pollution problem in crowded cities. In some countries, public administration forces the population in their country stop smoking in all public areas. I agree with

this

statement, and the reasons I agree will be discussed in the following paragraph before the conclusion is reached.

To begin

with, smoking is a niche thing. Some

people

love smoking, but some

people

do not love it. Smoking has many adverse effects,

such

as lung cancer and making toxic

smoke

into the air. Not only

people

who

smoke

but

also

their family or around

people

have

this

effect. In terms of

people

who get toxic

smoke

, they are called

second

-smokers.

For instance

, in Bangkok, the capital city of Thailand, the government do not have policies to handle

people

who

smoke

in public areas;

as a result

, they have the most

second

-smokers getting lung cancer from smokers in Southeast Asia.

In addition

, Banning smoking in public areas helps reduce waste in public parks. It makes a good environment and wind quality for residents.

For example

, in Singapore, banning smoking is their policy.

People

who

smoke

in a public zone will be punished and get a fee. Governments provide smoking zone in public parks. It is easier to store waste from the smoker. In conclusion, the government that bans smoking in public zones is highly advantageous for the community in their country. It reduces air pollution, waste from a smoker, and

second

smokers are reduced. From that advantage, I truly agree with

this

issue.