Introduction
Nowadays, smoking in public fields is the most significant air pollution problem in crowded cities. In some countries, public administration forces the population in their country stop smoking in all public areas. I agree with
this
statement, and the reasons I agree will be discussed in the following paragraph before the conclusion is reached.Linking Words
Body paragraph 1
To begin
with, smoking is a niche thing. Some Linking Words
people
love smoking, but some Use synonyms
people
do not love it. Smoking has many adverse effects, Use synonyms
such
as lung cancer and making toxic Linking Words
smoke
into the air. Not only Use synonyms
people
who Use synonyms
smoke
but Use synonyms
also
their family or around Linking Words
people
have Use synonyms
this
effect. In terms of Linking Words
people
who get toxic Use synonyms
smoke
, they are called Use synonyms
second
-smokers. Linking Words
For instance
, in Bangkok, the capital city of Thailand, the government do not have policies to handle Linking Words
people
who Use synonyms
smoke
in public areas; Use synonyms
as a result
, they have the most Linking Words
second
-smokers getting lung cancer from smokers in Southeast Asia.Linking Words
Body paragraph 2
In addition
, Banning smoking in public areas helps reduce waste in public parks. It makes a good environment and wind quality for residents. Linking Words
For example
, in Singapore, banning smoking is their policy. Linking Words
People
who Use synonyms
smoke
in a public zone will be punished and get a fee. Governments provide smoking zone in public parks. It is easier to store waste from the smoker.Use synonyms
Conclusion
In conclusion, the government that bans smoking in public zones is highly advantageous for the community in their country. It reduces air pollution, waste from a smoker, and
second
smokers are reduced. From that advantage, I truly agree with Linking Words
this
issue.Linking Words