Some people believe that teaching children at home is best for a child's development while others think that it is important for children to go to school. Discuss the advantages of both methods and give your own opinion.

There are many theories which sustain that children must learn at home and not at

school

, while others underline the opposite. The most common theory is the

second

, indeed, most kids usually go to

school

. The advantages of teaching in a public place are definitely proven. A child who has to go out will surely hang out with friends, learn how to behave in the social context and develop active behaviour. The main reason

of

Change preposition

for

show examples

these differences are made by the environment and the presence of other people beyond the sense of duty achieved. Many children grew up in

this

way and proved that the

school

is nothing but a little reproduction of the adult society.

For example

, I used to go to

school

and my personality is grown with positive vibes and exploring curiosity. The other way to think is based on the learning program in a focused manner.

Moreover

, the

home-teached

Correct your spelling

home-teacher

child will probably be more academically prepared. The cause of

this

gap is given

by

Change preposition

apply

show examples

the conditions in which the kid is located. Indeed, there is a lack of

distraction's

Change noun form

distraction

show examples

possibilities at home with a personal teacher.

Therefore

, the child could be totally focused on

school

objects. Introducing a real situation, my cousin often stays home to learn, indeed he developed a brilliant memory, even if he usually chooses not to go out and practise sports. In conclusion, I think the best choice is definitely to send kids to

school

giving them the opportunity to see different places and meet new people, even if it could cause a little gap on the academic side.