Some think that the Olympic games help bring people from different nations together. Others, however, think that hosting the Olympics wastes money which could be used for important issues. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Recently, the Paris
Olympics
has become a hot spot, thus
the necessity of it is open to intensive debate. Myriads petition that the Olympics
foster global communication, while
others believe that the funds can be better used for other pressing issues
. In this
discourse, I am going to expound on both edges in the forthcoming paragraphs and illustrate why I agree with the former theory.
To begin
with, the first notion is focusing on other significant matters is more important. The most prominent argument is that some pressing issues
such
as military, healthcare and infrastructure should take precedence, especially in developing countries. For instance
, nations with low income and tense social concerns, like the crisis in Ukraine, cannot afford to spend extra money on sports and training athletes. Furthermore
, countries need to prioritize urgent social issues
like the lack of transportation and fresh water, which contribute to folks' sense of happiness and belonging -a national priority.
On the contrary
, proponents of the Olympic
argue that the games lead to global unity. Fix the agreement mistake
Olympics
Firstly
, copious inhabitants believe that the Olympic games can facilitate international cooperation, consequently
boosting both the host nation's and participants' economies. To illustrate, the popularity of sporting brands like Nike and Adidas often increases during the Olympics
, boosting corporate income and ultimately adding to national tax revenue. Additionally
, the Olympics
can enhance tourism and global visibility for the host country. Secondly
, the games promote cultural exchange and understanding ,as competitors and tourists share their viewpoints in interviews and showcase unique ethnic costumes. Indeed, during the opening ceremony of the Paris Olympics
, the host highlighted famous European literature and classical films, allowing the masses to appreciate Paris’s rich culture and motivating residents to inherit it.
In a nutshell, according to
the aforementioned arguments, while
some argue that funds for the Olympics
could be used to address pressing domestic affairs, I personally believe that holding international competitions is beneficial for globalization. However
, it is crucial to balance these events with attention to domestic issues
to ensure overall
national well-being.Submitted by xeyojnn on
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.
task achievement
Try to provide a more detailed analysis when discussing counterarguments to ensure you are addressing all aspects evenly.
coherence cohesion
Make sure that each paragraph is not too lengthy to maintain reader engagement and clarity.
coherence cohesion
The essay features a clear introduction and conclusion, which effectively frame the discussion.
task achievement
Main points are supported by relevant examples, such as the reference to the crisis in Ukraine and the economic impact of brands like Nike and Adidas during the Olympics.