Some people think that charity organizations should only help people of their own country. But others believe that these organizations should give aid to people in great need wherever they live. Discuss both views and give your own view.

It is obvious to many observers that charitable activities have wider effects, than merely material aid. The increasing number of projects in the so-called
third
-world countries has got not only supporters but
also
vocal critics. They are concerned with the effects
such
activity has on the countries in question.
This
essay will discuss both positions. One view on
this
issue is that the scale of the charities should be limited to the country where they are based. The main reason in favour of
this
is the connection they have with the region and the knowledge that they have about the local issues. A common criticism of
this
view focuses on the fact that
such
a strategy prevents money flows from the rich into poor countries. While I admit
this
criticism, I still tend towards the position that charities should act locally in terms of their monetary help. At the same time, I believe that they should try to spread knowledge as far as possible An opposite view is that charities should help people who need
such
help the most. On the positive side, it indeed helps to move poor regions out of poverty.
However
, these donors often bound grant recipients to strict conditions. Many experts claim that
this
process continues to spread the relationship of domination between the developed and developing worlds. The example of tensions between non-government organisations (NGOs) and local governments clearly demonstrates
this
tension. To conclude,
this
essay has shown that local bonds could help organisations to act more effectively. In terms of equal money distribution, it is
also
argued in favour of keeping them in the communities where they we produced while spreading the knowledge to the people who could use it.
Submitted by j8d3 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Fully explain your ideas

To get an excellent score in the IELTS Task 2 writing section, one of the easiest and most effective tips is structuring your writing in the most solid format. A great argument essay structure may be divided to four paragraphs, in which comprises of four sentences (excluding the conclusion paragraph, which comprises of three sentences).

For we to consider an essay structure a great one, it should be looking like this:

  • Paragraph 1 - Introduction
    • Sentence 1 - Background statement
    • Sentence 2 - Detailed background statement
    • Sentence 3 - Thesis
    • Sentence 4 - Outline sentence
  • Paragraph 2 - First supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 3 - Second supporting paragraph
    • Sentence 1 - Topic sentence
    • Sentence 2 - Example
    • Sentence 3 - Discussion
    • Sentence 4 - Conclusion
  • Paragraph 4 - Conclusion
    • Sentence 1 - Summary
    • Sentence 2 - Restatement of thesis
    • Sentence 3 - Prediction or recommendation

Our recommended essay structure above comprises of fifteen (15) sentences, which will make your essay approximately 250 to 275 words.

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

What to do next:
Look at other essays: