Governments should spend money on railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

There are differing views on the issue of allocating the governmental budget to expand infrastructures. Despite several ,advantages a

society

may be taken from constructing

roads

, I would contend that a huge amount of

money

should be spent on

railways

for several reasons. Two major reasons for

this

position along with a drawback of building

roads

are intended to be discussed in

this

essay. One major drawback of road construction has been surprising. Den the considerable congestion of vehicles . Spending much more

money

on building

roads

, governments would indeed encourage more people to use their own car resulting in an ever-increasing number of vehicles on the

roads

.

In other words

, the much more

money

spent on

roads

, the more demand for purchasing vehicles would be provided in

society

which will inevitably lead to traffic jams as can be seen in several megacities.

Railways

,

nevertheless

, provide people with enormous benefits.

First

of all, it is an indisputable fact that one of the most environmentally-friendly means of transport which has been invented

thus

far is the train. Subway, train and other forms of railway systems have been recognized as the most compatible means of transport with environmental legislation.

As a result

,

this

seems an important reason why the government should consider more

money

on

railways

.

Further

and more importantly, though, it is safety and security that

railways

can bring out for

society

. Statistics have shown that the number of death and injuries due to road accidents are far more than

this

rate in railway transportation systems. By way of conclusion, I once again reaffirm my position that whilst

society

can reap the benefits of road construction, it is my belief that government should allocate its budget to

railways

owing to their safety and compatibility with environmental limitations.