One world government is better than a national government. Do the benefits outweigh disadvantages

It is true that many individuals look for the best

way

to develop their society.

One

way

to increase the country's system is that the

government

must be

one

for every part of the earth which would be better rather than the national

government

. Yet, there remain some disagreements as to whether the overall effects of

one

world administration have been positive or negative while there are certainly valid arguments to the contrary. I personally believe that the benefits of the national

government

far outweigh its drawbacks. These benefits are twofold.

First

of all, it is undisputable fact that every

nation

has its own culture and various outlooks. For

this

reason, national ascendancy is a more suitable and effective

way

to solve a

nation

's problem.

For example

, as you know there are many countries which have to be helped by the

government

. It would be too hard to control millions of countries with

one

world

government

. So, the general administration might not comprehend folk's nationality. It led us to be in big trouble.

On the other hand

, if the

government

will be

one

in the future

then

there would not be any interesting and entertaining things for different cultures.

For instance

, you would not be able to go to foreign countries for travelling due to the

one

government

.

Therefore

, implementing a single

government

for the current world does not confer a valid standpoint as every

nation

owns a distinctly unique background and requires. By

way

of my conclusion, I once reaffirm my position that

this

nation

can not outweigh its unrealistic application as a centralised

government

for the entire planet can not meet the individual needs of each

nation

. In my final thought, country leaders and politicians should jointly propose a more holistic approach in order to mitigate the severity of globally present issues