Details of politicians’ private lives should not be published in newspapers. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is thought that information regarding politicians’ personal
lives
should not be shared in print media.
This
essay strongly agrees with
this
suggestion because publishing these
details
could be harmful to their families, and obtaining
this
type of information might require breaking the law. First and foremost, what makes the
details
related to private aspects of politicians’
lives
should not be shared in newspapers is that it could be harmful not only to these individuals but
also
to their families.
This
is because revealing some
details
from their personal
lives
could expose them to unwanted comments or allegations, which might lead to a great deal of distress. In Poland,
for instance
, in 2015, the vice-prime minister committed suicide
due to
not handling the pressure caused by the paparazzi invading his and his family’s private life.
Furthermore
, obtaining
this
type of information, in most cases, means breaking the law.
This
is because the right to privacy is one of the most fundamental policies in society, and anyone who wants to access the
lives
of politicians must obtain their consent.
However
, not only are paparazzi hired to invade properties belonging to politicians to take photos without their permission but
also
politicians’ colleagues and relatives are bribed to share confidential facts from their
lives
.
For instance
, the accident in which Princess Diana was killed was partly caused by the paparazzi who followed her car, trying to take photos of her and her boyfriend against their will. In conclusion, I strongly support the suggestion that politicians’
lives
should not be subject to the interest of newspapers because revealing personal facts from politicians'
lives
could destroy their family
life
Fix the agreement mistake
lives
show examples
and the process of obtaining these
details
often
required
Wrong verb form
requires
show examples
wrongdoing.
Submitted by prostoy.pacan4ek on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

coherence cohesion
Ensure that each example is developed in sufficient detail and is directly relevant to the main point of the paragraph.
task achievement
Make sure to address all aspects of the task by discussing both agreement and disagreement with the statement.

Your opinion

Don’t put your opinion unless you are asked to give it.

If the question asks what you think, you MUST give your opinion to get a good score.

Don’t leave your opinion until the conclusion.

Here are examples of instructions that require you to give your opinion:

...do you agree or disagree?...do you think...?...your opinion...?

Discover more tips in The Ultimate Guide to Get a Target Band Score of 7+ »— a book that's free for 🚀 Premium users.

Topic Vocabulary:
  • intrusion
  • accountability
  • transparency
  • sensationalism
  • privacy
  • public interest
  • collateral damage
  • precedent
  • responsible journalism
  • exploitation
  • democratic processes
  • media culture
  • balance
What to do next:
Look at other essays: