Some people think that vertical city is the best, where people live and work in a tall building. Others think that horizontal city is better. What is your opinion.

individuals are split when it comes to

cities

. Some believe that both living and working in tall buildings in vertical

cities

are the best. Others,

on the contrary

, assert that expansion of the

city

on the horizon is better. There are valid arguments on both sides, which I will discuss and conclude by clearly stating my viewpoint. Proponents of the vertical

city

claim that high-raised buildings are suitable for people to live and work there.

Initially

, gathering a number of individuals in a building has its own problems imagine a vertical

city

like New York which is experiencing huge traffic jams because the capacity of roads is not infinite. More importantly, many types of

pollution

like air

pollution

, water

pollution

and even sound

pollution

become common in

city

zone,

for

instance

Add the comma(s)

,instance

show examples

the volume of disposal abandoned in their water supplies could be horrible. Opponents,

conversely

, respond that horizontal

cities

have more comfort both in living and working. Primarily, extending the

city

on the horizon needs more roads and

city

infrastructure which means less traffic during rush hours.

Secondly

, living in a house is much more comfortable than small apartments in tall buildings,

although

you can have your own privacy, a little playground for your children, a small garden if you have green fingers

as well as

a private pool. In conclusion, I tend to agree with the advocates of horizontal

cities

, since they have a more robust argument and I care about privacy and the environment. It should not be forgotten that a vertical

city

is usually the case, providing more facilities complexes and job opportunities.