According to
many people, old constructions should be preserved by spending money on renovation but, the opposition believes that they are of no use and should be demolished to replace with the latest buildings. There are pros and cons for both these views, which will be discussed Linking Words
further
through Linking Words
this
essay with examples.
Linking Words
To begin
with, ancient architecture is considered priceless and reveals the history of that nation. Many Linking Words
such
historical constructions and monuments have stood out in history that brought a representation to that nation. Linking Words
For example
, the Taj Mahal was built by Linking Words
Shazahan
for his wife as a token of his love but, in no time the white marble beauty become one of the seven wonders of the world. So, if there was no investment made in renovating Correct your spelling
Shanahan
such
ancient monuments, the Taj Mahal would not have been one of the seven wonders of the world.
Linking Words
On the other hand
, keeping up the old buildings without remodelling or renovating is a tough task. Especially when those were owned by the government and there is no revenue generated out of the property, Linking Words
such
architectures must be replaced by useful infrastructures like hospitals, public parks or schools. Linking Words
For example
, in a Country like India where there are many religious constructions like Temples, Mosques that were built centuries ago in government lands that are of no use and are either collapsed with age or Linking Words
due to
weather extremities, Linking Words
such
ancient places should be demolished for building modern public infrastructure.
So, Linking Words
to conclude
whether a historical architecture is renovated, or demolished by the government should be decided based on its importance of it in the nation and the revenue generated from it.Linking Words
varshar1612