while
some public thinks that international touristry has facilitated cross-cultural understanding, others believe that disputes can be created by Linking Words
this
major industry. personally, I hold the belief that touristry has promoted peace rather than tensions between regions.
on the one hand, those who advocate the development of touristry may point to a better interracial understanding. it is true that many public believe in false preconceptions of the tradition and culture of another region. Linking Words
therefore
, travelling helps the community to take a closer look into the locals' mindset that can correct their existing prejudices. Linking Words
as a result
, cross-border travel is likely to strengthen the bond between land, which is beneficial for the economy and politics. Linking Words
for example
, in 2019, the government in Vietnam decided to give many of its citizens an opportunity to travel to another state with a view to building up a good relationship with them.
Linking Words
on the other hand
, Linking Words
the
international tours can create disputes among populations from other nations. it is worth mentioning that tourists can unintentionally offend the local values without in-depth knowledge of the local customs and cultures. Correct article usage
apply
therefore
, tensions among land can be created that are likely to result in wars and conflicts. Linking Words
for instance
, crowds in Iran need to be well-dressed when they go out, but tourists from other nations do not know about Linking Words
this
custom. Linking Words
consequently
, the relationship between these land and Iran becomes more acrimonious.
in conclusion, I strongly believe that cross-border travel is hugely advantageous for promoting peace. Linking Words
however
, its negative effects on the association among nations need to be taken into consideration.Linking Words
patelyash045