Some people believe that professionals, such as doctors and engineers, should be required to work in the country where they did their training. Others believe they should be free to work in another country if they wish. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion

Recently, there has been turmoil among the community members regarding the travelling of the professional workforce to other regions. Whilst the proponents agree that medics and engineering professionals are obliged to serve the public, opponents argue that they have the freedom to choose where to task. In the following essay, both notions will be scrutinized, and I will show my support for the latter one. On the one hand, despite my disagreement, a category of nation discern that it is the duty of professional work sectors to serve their national services.
This
is because when they migrate to jobs in other communities, their homeland will encounter a severe brain drain.
Moreover
, they might face cultural shock in host people that will
consequently
impede them from fulfilling their dreams. An eminent example of
this
is the Golf Countries which ensure thriving jobs for their natives in order to encourage them to stay in their community.
Thus
, as long as skilled workers are given promising job prospects in their motherland, they will exert their utmost efforts to stay and develop their public.
On the other hand
, opponents and I posit that citizens of any category have the right to select where to live and struggle
according to
their own preferences. To illustrate
this
, if medical practitioners and civil engineers suffer from poor labour conditions in their countries, they will ultimately seek higher life and job standards globally. In Egypt,
for instance
, a plethora of professionals migrate as they suffer from deteriorated health and infrastructure
environment
Fix the agreement mistake
environments
show examples
.
Therefore
, what can be said from
this
example is that not only do detrimental local conditions lead to brain drain, but they
also
lead to the suffering of the citizens. In conclusion,
after
this
essay has manifested the above-mentioned points, it can be reiterated that even though a proportion of the community is of the belief that professionals who pursued their internship in definite land ought to work with the same people, I am a staunch believer that they have the right to quest for more prestigious work and life circumstances.
Hence
, authorities should entice their valuable workforce to stay by supporting them with prosperous opportunities.
Submitted by patelnazu121 on

Unauthorized use and/or duplication of this material without express and written permission from this site’s author and/or owner is strictly prohibited. Excerpts and links may be used, provided that full and clear credit is given to Writing9 with appropriate and specific direction to the original content.

Essay Feedback
Task Response: The essay provides a clear opinion on the topic and discusses both views. However, there are some instances of unclear expression that could hinder the overall coherence of the response.
Essay Feedback
Coherence and Cohesion: The essay demonstrates a logical organization of ideas and relevant examples to support the main points. However, the introduction and conclusion are somewhat weak and could be improved for better coherence and cohesion.
Topic Vocabulary:
  • professionals
  • doctors
  • engineers
  • required
  • training
  • home country
  • cultural
  • linguistic
  • advantages
  • economic impact
  • free
  • another country
  • globalization
  • international collaboration
  • improving
  • skills
  • knowledge
  • experience
  • opinion
What to do next:
Look at other essays: