Incentivising art is important,
however
, wasting public resources by giving away money to artists alternately enhancing the health system and the country is foolish. I agree that the boons of infusing cash in culture are notable in the region's economy, notwithstanding the way mentioned in the question is not reasonable.
Linking Words
Moreover
, one example of a wise investment in culture is South Korea. Linking Words
Instead
of giving cash to artists, the country focused on exporting its music and soap operas worldwide. As an outcome, people wanted to go to the nation which boosted their tourism, Linking Words
this
Linking Words
ensued
in the growth of wealth of the population since more jobs were created to attend to the demand of tourists. Nowadays, Korean drama and K-pop (Korean popular music) are the world's phenomenon.
In Verb problem
resulted
this
context, the advertisement of cultural customs improves the economy and indirectly boosts the Linking Words
artist's
and musicians' careers. Change noun form
artists
Additionally
, an example that giving monetary help directly to an artist is not wise is Brazil. President Lula's strategy of investing in Linking Words
this
area made those creators richer, and the population poorer and did not impact the art.
Linking Words
Furthermore
, the approach mentioned previously is contradictory, because how is the government supposed to choose whom they will invest? How many people will receive Linking Words
this
benefit? If those points are not planned other prime quotas of investment, Linking Words
for example
, health, urban development and education will suffer a fall, Linking Words
hence
impacting the entire society.
In conclusion, is utterly necessary to consider the boons and pitfalls of Linking Words
this
approach, because it can have a powerful negative influence on the community.Linking Words
heyohbruv