Education, from preschool through university, should be paid for by the government and therefore free to students. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Some people argue that government is responsible for financing scholarships dan from the preliminary academy to college. By providing 100% subsidy, the development of youth might lead to better economic conditions in the future. In

this

essay, I shall examine how a nation reaches a pinnacle of success whenever they invest in future generations.

Firstly

, quite a large number of people could not even afford daily meals. In a country where the statistics of famine are high, it does not make sense to send their children to an academy. It can be seen by a number of non-profit organizations established. A few marginal students prefer to drop out of their previous academy in order to assist their family's economy.

For instance

, my friend started looking for a job when he was only 15 because his father was not able to pay the tuition.

This

leads to him not completing high school.

Secondly

, it has been clear that government should provide quality learning for all regardless of social status so that a nation can achieve its mission. Take Germany as an example. Not only do they eliminate primary to middle school tuition, they even have a budget for students who want to go to university.

Hence

, Germans teenagers mostly are aspiring to be a professor

according to

research.

To sum up

, there is an undeniable evidence that literacy is the best investment for any nation that aspires in leading the world. The RoI for free information for youth is promising. In the future, those students will give back to the government that has helped them succeed.