Wild animals have no place in the 21st century, so protecting them is a waste of resources. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this view?

In the fast-paced world, there is no place for wild

animals

Use synonyms

to live, so trying to prevent them from extinction is supposed to be a waste the natural sources. I partly agree with

this

Linking Words

statement,

however

Linking Words

, I believe that defending wild

animals

Use synonyms

is beneficial for the environment, and the reason why I think so will be illustrated with certain clues and ideas in the following paragraphs. On the one hand, spending resources on

wildlife

Use synonyms

conservation may be useless.

This

Linking Words

means that the expenditure of government on building up zoos to keep endangered members of

wildlife

Use synonyms

may affect on lives of people.

For instance

Linking Words

, some pollution problems,

such

Linking Words

as air pollution, and noise pollution are might be caused by

animals

Use synonyms

in zoos in residential areas. Another good example is that

wildlife

Use synonyms

can reduce the salaries of workers who are employed by the government.

On the other hand

Linking Words

, the conservation of wild

animals

Use synonyms

is the responsibility of each individual, and

this

Linking Words

helps people to maintain the real state of nature.

Also

Linking Words

, every creature in the world is interrelated with others.

That is

Linking Words

why it is vital to protect an endangered species.

Furthermore

Linking Words

, people can manage to make the youngest generation see and know about the lives of wild

animals

Use synonyms

in the future. All things considered, I can say that even though there are some disadvantages to

wildlife

Use synonyms

conservation, the advantages have a good effect on human life.

Moreover

Linking Words

, fauna and flora are integral parts of life on earth.