Introduction
It could be argued that in order to achieve (not the) gender quality, some measures have to be taken,
such
as accepting an equal number of both genders into universities. I entirely disagree with Linking Words
this
proposal for some reasons as will be illustrated in the following paragraphs.
Linking Words
Body · 1
Firstly
, designating a specific count to be accepted depending on the sex, does actually oppose the principle of “the fair go”. Linking Words
For instance
, if someone got accepted at an educational institution for just belonging to a certain classification, Linking Words
this
could affect another person’s right to be accepted Linking Words
instead
, if they are more competent. Linking Words
As a result
, we will have a number of (no a) degree holders who are not competent or qualified enough; Linking Words
however
, they managed to achieve a high educational level because of other considerations. Linking Words
Moreover
, the notion of supporting women for the mere fact that they are women contradicts the concept and the essence of equality.
Linking Words
Body · 2
Additionally
, supporting females by giving Linking Words
such
grants, in my view, may have a negative influence on them. Linking Words
For example
, if I can get approval for enrollment on a course or take a job based on my gender, Linking Words
this
may make me less committed to constant self-improvement. If I am having extra credit for being a female Linking Words
then
there is no motivation to work more on my skills and compete in the market to get a job or so. Linking Words
Hence
, productivity and quality would not meet the required standards.
Linking Words
Conclusion
In conclusion, forcing the number of males and females to be even at universities or any
elsewhere
, may impact the chance of other people who are better candidates. Linking Words
Also
, it may not encourage women to work more on their skills and abilities.Linking Words