It could be argued that in order to achieve (not the) gender quality, some measures have to be taken,
such
as accepting an equal number of both genders into universities. I entirely disagree with Linking Words
this
proposal for some reasons as will be illustrated in the following paragraphs.
Linking Words
Firstly
, designating a specific count to be accepted depending on the sex, does actually oppose the principle of “the fair go”. Linking Words
For instance
, if someone got accepted at an educational institution for just belonging to a certain classification, Linking Words
this
could affect another person’s right to be accepted Linking Words
instead
, if they are more competent. Linking Words
As a result
, we will have a number of (no a) degree holders who are not competent or qualified enough; Linking Words
however
, they managed to achieve a high educational level because of other considerations. Linking Words
Moreover
, the notion of supporting women for the mere fact that they are women contradicts the concept and the essence of equality.
Linking Words
Additionally
, supporting females by giving Linking Words
such
grants, in my view, may have a negative influence on them. Linking Words
For example
, if I can get approval for enrollment on a course or take a job based on my gender, Linking Words
this
may make me less committed to constant self-improvement. If I am having extra credit for being a female Linking Words
then
there is no motivation to work more on my skills and compete in the market to get a job or so. Linking Words
Hence
, productivity and quality would not meet the required standards.
In conclusion, forcing the number of males and females to be even at universities or any Linking Words
elsewhere
, may impact the chance of other people who are better candidates. Linking Words
Also
, it may not encourage women to work more on their skills and abilities.Linking Words
fatmasharaf191